2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 1984 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1984 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Palio II weights approximately 469 kg more than 1984 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1984 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Palio II | 1984 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Fiat | Jaguar |
| Model | Palio II | XJR |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1581 cc | 5343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 906 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 90 L |
