2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 1991 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,697 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Palio II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (68 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Palio II weights approximately 225 kg more than 1991 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Nissan Pulsar (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1991 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 1991 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Palio II | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2440 mm |