2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (68 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Palio II weights approximately 313 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Palio II | 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Fiat | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Palio II | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1697 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1783 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2730 mm |
