2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 1993 Volvo 960
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Volvo 960 (187 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (68 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Palio II weights approximately 253 kg more than 1993 Volvo 960.
Because 1993 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 1993 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Palio II | 960 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1783 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2780 mm |