2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,697 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Palio II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Palio II (68 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Palio II weights approximately 359 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Palio II (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Palio II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Palio II | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | Palio II | Midge |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1400 mm |
