2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 1996 Mini MK VI
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Palio II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Palio II (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Palio II (103 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Palio II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 1996 Mini MK VI | |
Make | Fiat | Mini |
Model | Palio II | MK VI |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2040 mm |