2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 395 kg more than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Fiat Palio II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Palio II | Ranger |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3010 mm |