2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 2003 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2003 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Because 2003 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda RX-8 (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (103 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 2003 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Palio II | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 211 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Top Speed | 164 km/hour | 235 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.5 seconds | 6.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 61 L |