2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 2004 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Because 2004 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (103 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 2004 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Palio II | Econoline |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3510 mm |