2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1013 kg more than 2006 Fiat Palio II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (140 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Palio II | Armada |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1581 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.4 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 2388 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 106 L |