2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, both 2006 Fiat Palio II and 2006 Holden Commodore were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 260 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (140 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | Palio II | Commodore |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |