2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Fiat Palio II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Fiat Palio II would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (103 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 2010 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Palio II | Rogue |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |