2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Fiat Palio II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Fiat Palio II would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (68 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (135 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | Palio II | Epica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 135 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |