2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 2011 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2011 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Fiat Palio II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Fiat Palio II would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (68 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Palio II | 2011 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Palio II | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 20.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 65 L |
