2006 Fiat Panda vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Fiat Panda is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Panda. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Panda weights approximately 601 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 2006 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Zastava 102. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Panda | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Fiat | Zastava |
| Model | Panda | 102 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2160 mm |
