2006 Fiat Panda vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2006 Fiat Panda is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Panda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 70 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Panda weights approximately 195 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.

Because 2006 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Panda (197 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade. 2006 Fiat Panda has automatic transmission and 2004 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2004 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Fiat Panda will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: