2006 Fiat Punto vs. 1982 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 2006 Fiat Punto is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Punto is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Punto (79 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Punto should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Punto weights approximately 903 kg more than 1982 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Punto (114 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Punto will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Punto | 1982 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Fiat | Seat |
Model | Punto | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 114 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1783 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2460 mm |