2006 Fiat Punto vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Fiat Punto is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Punto (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Punto should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Punto weights approximately 225 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Punto (114 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Punto will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Punto | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Fiat | Zastava |
| Model | Punto | 102 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 114 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2160 mm |
