2006 Fiat Siena vs. 1982 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2006 Fiat Siena is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,697 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mercury Lynx (70 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Siena. (68 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mercury Lynx should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Siena weights approximately 695 kg more than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Siena (136 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Siena | 1982 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Fiat | Mercury |
Model | Siena | Lynx |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.2 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 43 L |