2006 Fiat Siena vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2006 Fiat Siena is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,581 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Siena (100 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Siena should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Siena weights approximately 1043 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Siena. (74 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2004 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Siena.

Compare all specifications: