2006 Fiat Siena vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Fiat Siena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Fiat Siena would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Siena. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Siena.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Siena. (102 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Siena | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Siena | Micra |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 46 L |