2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Stilo (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 140 kg more than 2006 Fiat Stilo.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Stilo | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Stilo | Crestline |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 3929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2940 mm |
