2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 1963 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Stilo (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Because 1963 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Stilo (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Taunus. (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Stilo | 1963 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Stilo | Taunus |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2446 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |