2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 1963 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Stilo (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1963 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Stilo (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Stilo | 1963 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Fiat | Isuzu |
Model | Stilo | Minx |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2446 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |