2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Stilo (131 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 445 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Stilo (162 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Stilo | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Fiat | Volvo |
| Model | Stilo | 220 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1746 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 45 L |
