2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Stilo. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Stilo.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (258 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Stilo. (162 Nm). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Stilo | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
Make | Fiat | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Stilo | 280 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1746 cc | 2778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 162 Nm | 258 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 86.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 78.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2410 mm |