2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 1974 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Stilo (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1974 Lotus Eclat. (160 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1974 Lotus Eclat.
Because 1974 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Stilo (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Lotus Eclat. (191 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Lotus Eclat.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Stilo | 1974 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Fiat | Lotus |
Model | Stilo | Eclat |
Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2446 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 95.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 69.3 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |