2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 1978 Lada 1200
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Stilo (168 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1978 Lada 1200. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1978 Lada 1200.
Because 1978 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Stilo (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Lada 1200. (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Stilo | 1978 Lada 1200 | |
Make | Fiat | Lada |
Model | Stilo | 1200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2446 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |