2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Stilo (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240.
Because 1983 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Stilo (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Stilo | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Stilo | 240 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2446 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |