2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 1984 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Stilo (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1984 Ford Falcon. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Falcon.
Because 1984 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ford Falcon (240 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Stilo. (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1984 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Stilo | 1984 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Stilo | Falcon |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2446 cc | 3273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1870 mm |