2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 1999 Lincoln LS

To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lincoln LS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Stilo. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Stilo.

Because 1999 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lincoln LS (278 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Stilo. (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Stilo.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Fiat Stilo 1999 Lincoln LS
Make Fiat Lincoln
Model Stilo LS
Year Released 2006 1999
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2446 cc 2967 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 168 HP 211 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 278 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.4 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 10.5:1
Top Speed 215 km/hour 219 km/hour
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1870 mm