2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Stilo | 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur | |
| Make | Fiat | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Stilo | Silver Spur |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3170 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 108 L |
