2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR

To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Stilo. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Stilo.

Because 2002 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Stilo. (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Stilo. 2002 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 2006 Fiat Stilo has manual transmission. 2006 Fiat Stilo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Fiat Stilo 2002 Jaguar XJR
Make Fiat Jaguar
Model Stilo XJR
Year Released 2006 2002
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2446 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 168 HP 390 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 525 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 86.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.4 mm 90.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 9.1:1
Acceleration 0-100mph 8.8 seconds 5.9 seconds
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1870 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.7 L/100km 12.3 L/100km