2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 2009 Ford Ka
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Fiat Stilo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Fiat Stilo would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Stilo (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Stilo (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Stilo | 2009 Ford Ka | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Stilo | Ka |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2446 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 70.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 78.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 11.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 215 km/hour | 159 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.8 seconds | 13.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |