2006 Ford Bantam vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2006 Ford Bantam is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2006 Ford Bantam. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 755 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Bantam. (110 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Bantam | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Bantam | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2292 cc |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2480 mm |