2006 Ford Bantam vs. 1979 Seat 124

To start off, 2006 Ford Bantam is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat 124. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat 124 would be higher. At 1,297 cc, 2006 Ford Bantam is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Bantam (74 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1979 Seat 124. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Bantam should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat 124. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 785 kg more than 1979 Seat 124. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Bantam (110 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Seat 124. (90 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Bantam will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Seat 124.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Bantam 1979 Seat 124
Make Ford Seat
Model Bantam 124
Year Released 2006 1979
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1297 cc 1197 cc
Horse Power 74 HP 64 HP
Torque 110 Nm 90 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3700 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1715 kg 930 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 4070 mm
Vehicle Height 2120 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2430 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]