2006 Ford Bantam vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Ford Bantam is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Bantam is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Bantam (94 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Bantam should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 1976 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Bantam (137 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 323. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Bantam will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Bantam | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Bantam | 323 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 137 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 77.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 45 L |