2006 Ford Bantam vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 2006 Ford Bantam is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda 626 (89 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Ford Bantam. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 510 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda 626 (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Bantam. (110 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Bantam | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Bantam | 626 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2620 mm |