2006 Ford Bantam vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Ford Bantam is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 176 more horse power than 2006 Ford Bantam. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 65 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio.
Because 1996 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Bantam. (110 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Bantam | 1996 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Bantam | Clio |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2490 mm |
