2006 Ford Bantam vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2006 Ford Bantam is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Seat Arosa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Seat Arosa would be higher. At 1,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Arosa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2006 Ford Bantam. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 426 kg more than 2000 Seat Arosa.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Arosa (117 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Bantam. (110 Nm). This means 2000 Seat Arosa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Bantam | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Bantam | Arosa |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1289 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2850 mm |