2006 Ford Bantam vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Ford Bantam is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (130 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2006 Ford Bantam. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 329 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (183 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Bantam. (110 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Bantam | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Bantam | Tribute |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 130 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 62 L |
