2006 Ford Bantam vs. 2005 Volvo S40
To start off, 2006 Ford Bantam is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volvo S40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volvo S40 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S40 (218 HP) has 144 more horse power than 2006 Ford Bantam. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 311 kg more than 2005 Volvo S40.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S40 (340 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Bantam. (110 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Bantam | 2005 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Bantam | S40 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2435 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 218 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1404 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |