2006 Ford Bantam vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, both 2006 Ford Bantam and 2006 Holden Epica were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 59 more horse power than 2006 Ford Bantam. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Bantam.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Bantam. (179 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Bantam. 2006 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Bantam has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Bantam will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Bantam | 2006 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Bantam | Epica |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2492 cc |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
