2006 Ford Bantam vs. 2008 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2008 Nissan Micra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Bantam. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Bantam would be higher. At 1,297 cc, 2006 Ford Bantam is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Ford Bantam. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 672 kg more than 2008 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 110 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Bantam | 2008 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Bantam | Micra |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1238 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 46 L |