2006 Ford Bantam vs. 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Bantam. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Bantam would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 970 more horse power than 2006 Ford Bantam. (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 1576 kg more than 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR.
Because 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 923 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Bantam. (137 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Bantam | 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
Make | Ford | Koenigsegg |
Model | Bantam | CCXR |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 1064 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 1060 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 22 L/100km |