2006 Ford E-150 vs. 1962 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lincoln Continental (300 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Lincoln Continental (630 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1962 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 1962 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | E-150 | Continental |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 7043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 109.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 90 L |