2006 Ford E-150 vs. 1963 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jaguar MK X. (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jaguar MK X.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 1963 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | E-150 | MK X |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3780 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 63 L |