2006 Ford E-150 vs. 1977 Rover 2600
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Rover 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Rover 2600 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1977 Rover 2600. (136 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1977 Rover 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-150 weights approximately 368 kg more than 1977 Rover 2600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Rover 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Rover 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Rover 2600. (206 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Rover 2600.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 1977 Rover 2600 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | E-150 | 2600 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1348 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |