2006 Ford E-150 vs. 1978 Volvo 260
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 260. (146 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 260.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 260. (219 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 1978 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | E-150 | 260 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |