2006 Ford E-150 vs. 1993 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1993 Mercedes-Benz C. (190 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1993 Mercedes-Benz C.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mercedes-Benz C. (275 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 1993 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | E-150 | C |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 275 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 62 L |